![]() ![]() You'll notice the 35mm more - it sticks out more - even though it's petite as a 2nd lens, on the camera it's longer than the 27mm and that makes the camera as a whole feel bulkier. If I were going for a 35, I'd go for the 1.4 because I want the ability to get a shallower depth of field for portraits & a bit more character. The 35mm will probably be sharper - I don't own that particular lens and will act more like a normal 50 - great for portraits etc. The quick f/2.8 aperture ensures you can always record the moment as you see it without compromising quality. Designed for wide angle work, the Fuji 27mm f2.8 XF lens offers a great chance to capture wide scenes with real quality. The 27 is a good every-day knockabout pancake lens - throw it on the camera and just shoot. The Fuji XF 27mm f/2.8 lens installs confidence as you shoot, making it the perfect wide angle lens. It's the quintessential pancake "normal" lens - neither too wide nor too tele, right in the middle. LensHero compares the Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 vs the Fujifilm 35mm f/1.4 XF R to find out which is the winner. Fuji's algorithms do a good job cleaning it up thought so you won't notice it. It's a fine lens - a little soft in the corners even at moderate apertures (someone will fight me on this but I can back up that assertion). I own the 27mm I just posted some concert photos I took with it, taken with the X-Pro1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |